Pursuant to procedure provided in ERO, ERCOM appointed a hearing officer.
Union's petition for the peremptory writ alleged that County refused to negotiate with Union on the subject of job classification as required by ERO and thus had violated section 12(a)(3) of ERO. (Los Angeles County Employees Assn., Local 660 v. Section 7 of ERO creates a commission of three herein referred to as ERCOM, to administer its provisions. County in 1968, conforming to the legislative policy of MMBA enacted Ordinance 9646 entitled Employees Relations Ordinance (ERO). Code, §§ 3500-3510) which authorized public employees to bargain with governmental entities and encouraged the entities to negotiate and consult with its employees. ) In 1968 the state enacted the Meyer-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA) (Gov. Public employees as distinguished from private employees in California do not have the right to bargain collectively or to strike absent an enabling statute.
Los angeles ercom trial#
The trial court denied the writ and this appeal follows. Cassidy and Joe Ben Hudgens, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents.Īppellants, Local 119 of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (Union) petitioned the superior court to issue a peremptory writ mandating respondents, the County of Los Angeles and its department of personnel (County) to negotiate with Union in respect of job classifications. Warren, Adell & Miller and Hirsch Adell for Plaintiff and Appellant. J., with Compton and Beach, JJ., concurring.) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 119, Plaintiff and Appellant, v.